Augustine’s Confessions
consists in a blend of honest personal narrative, serious intellectual inquiry,
and heartfelt devotional prayer. From the first to the last line of this
classic work, he addresses himself to God. The entire book, in which Augustine tells
the story of his conversion to Christ and engages in profound and extensive
theological and philosophical reflection, takes the form of a prayer to his
Lord. Augustine believed the study of academic disciplines can be regularly, deliberately,
and explicitly combined with the practice of the spiritual discipline of
prayer. As a result, both his mind and his heart are transformed.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Why Bodies are Good Things
Though we can survive without our bodies, we cannot thrive in a disembodied state. Assuming
we can have memories without brains, we can think
as mere minds or souls and we can pray,
but we cannot sense and we cannot perform actions that require a physical
means; we are unable to see without eyes and we need legs in order to
dance. Though bodiless communication with other humans might be possible
through telepathy, we would not be able to see, hear, or embrace each other. In
sum, without bodies we would be crippled.
Embodiment is a wonderful gift from God.
Labels:
act,
body,
brain,
communication,
crippled,
disembodied,
embodiment,
gift,
God,
memory,
mind,
pray,
sense,
soul,
telepathy
Monday, February 27, 2012
Organizing the Library
In Reading the Map of
Knowledge: The Art of Being a Librarian, Peter Briscoe provides an “epistemically
dynamic” way of representing a library’s collection. He recommends conceiving
of it as organized into four concentric rings. At the center is the Index,
which consists of works such as catalogs that identify and locate other works.
Next is the Encyclopedia, which is comprised by reference works that summarize
other works. The Canon is next. It is made up of the works that contain the
current state of knowledge. The outer and largest ring is the Archive, which
includes all the other works.
Friday, February 24, 2012
Avoiding Economic Extremes
One of the claims for which Daniel Altman argues in Outrageous Fortunes is that neither a
purely capitalist nor a completely communist economic system is sustainable in
the long term. Among other problems, unrestricted capitalism tends to result in
market failures that create inequality and in opportunities taken by people
with more resources rather than by people with more talent. And uncompromised
communism tends to fail due to isolation from wider markets and the difficulty
of central planning. What is needed is an appropriate balance between control
and regulation on the one hand and freedom and privatization on the other.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Stewarding Our Sexuality
In Homosexuality and
the Christian, Mark Yarhouse advocates that Christians “steward” their
sexuality. Just as we don’t own our money or other "possessions," we aren’t the
owners of our bodies (First Corinthians 6:19-20). Instead, God owns these things
and he has entrusted them to us to use them wisely for his purposes. Stewarding
our sexuality means behaving sexually in ways that serve others, further God’s
Kingdom, and bring honor and glory to God. Both Christians who struggle with a
homosexual orientation and unmarried heterosexual Christians have a special
burden to bear in this area. For them, sexual stewardship means celibacy.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Apologetics & Anthropology
Dave Tetrick, a former student of mine who is with the Peace
Corps in Burkina Faso, told me he values his Westmont education now because of
how it has enabled him to learn how to understand those he has been called to
serve. He said his philosophy course on “The New Atheists” provided an
opportunity to understand and appreciate those with whom he doesn’t agree. When
I discuss the New Atheists with students, my emphasis is on an apologetical
defense of belief in God. What Dave told me convinces me that an “anthropological”
understanding of unbelievers would also be valuable.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Getting the Hay to the Goats
In a recent talk to Presbyterian ministers, John Ortberg
borrowed Garrison Keillor’s criticism of a Lake Woebegone minister whose
sermons did not “put the hay where the goats could get it.” Ortberg said many
Christian churches know how to reach the “goats” but don’t have any “hay” for
them and many other churches have the “hay” but don’t know how to reach the
“goats.” He put his Presbyterian denomination in the latter category and urged
his audience to look for a movement of God’s Spirit that would enable their church
to equip disciples to be effective teachers of the nations.
Knowing a God Who is Worthy of Worship
Recently I attended a talk by philosopher Paul Moser about
his latest book, The Evidence for God:
Religious Knowledge Reexamined. In this book he argues that traditional philosophical
arguments for God’s existence (ontological, cosmological, teleological) fail to
justify belief in a God who is worthy of worship. He contends that we acquire
adequate reasons to believe in such a God by means of an ongoing experience of
interacting personally with God as God discloses himself to us and we submit
our wills to his transforming love. Moser says we can know God only as
participants and not as mere spectators.
Labels:
arguments,
experience,
God,
knowledge,
love,
Moser,
participants,
reasons,
spectators,
worship
Friday, February 17, 2012
Work: Job, Career, or Vocation?
How should we think about our work? At the “microscopic”
level, it is a series of actions
ordered to a particular end. This definition applies to the simple tasks we perform during our workday. But
these tasks add up to a project and a
series of projects can constitute a job.
We think of a job primarily as a means of making money. When a job is a career, we consider it as a more
permanent and more meaningful mode of employment. But when our career becomes a
means of fulfilling our vocation, it
becomes a way to serve God.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Non-Rational Atheism
Carl Sagan created a TV series about the universe entitled
“Cosmos.” He later wrote a book with the same title based on the series. The
premise of both the TV show and the book is Sagan’s pronouncement that “The
Cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be.” The unmistakable
implication of this quasi-religious slogan is that there is no supernatural God.
The book Cosmology: A Very Short
Introduction begins with a similar presumption. The author defines
“cosmology” as the study of everything
but he never mentions God. In both cases, atheism is simply presupposed without
argument.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Idolatry and Salvation
Idolatry involves putting something that is not God in the
place of God. An alternative god is whatever we value most. Since we tend to esteem
most what we believe will satisfy us best, our idols are those non-God things
we turn to most often for fulfillment. And our fulfillment requires not only
getting more of what we need but also getting rid of what prevents us from
wholeness. If we are unable to free ourselves from such obstacles, we need a
savior. So idolaters will usually seek salvation apart from God. But salvation
is found only in Jesus Christ.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Magisterial vs. Ministerial Uses of Reason
Martin Luther said human reason should be “ministerial”
rather than “magisterial” in its theological uses. A magisterial use of reason in
theology would involve employing it like a magistrate standing in judgment over
the Christian gospel to determine whether or not it is true apart from
dependence on the Bible and the Holy Spirit. On the other hand, human reason is
ministerial when it is guided by and in service of God’s wisdom (made available
to us in his Word and through his Spirit). So for Luther, as for Aquinas,
theology is the queen and philosophy is the queen’s handmaiden.
Labels:
Aquinas,
Bible,
gospel,
handmaiden,
Holy Spirit,
Luther,
magisterial,
ministerial,
queen,
reason,
theology
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Science as Religion
The “New Atheists” (Harris, Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchens, and
others) think religious believers are irrational and religion is dangerous.
They contend we would be better off without it. What do they recommend instead?
Harris proposes a science-based spirituality of meditation, Dawkins extols
empowerment from scientific knowledge of the natural world, Dennett affirms a
sense of humble selflessness caused by awareness of the universe’s complexity,
and Hitchens values unrestricted scientific inquiry leading to human
enlightenment and liberation. Clearly, each of them desires an experience of
transcendence through science. It appears that rather than replacing religion
with science they are making science religion.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Multiversities & Christian Liberal Arts Colleges
In The Uses of the University, former
University of California president Clark Kerr wrote that though the university
started as a single community, the large American university had become instead
(in 1963) a collection of communities. He also claimed that the liberal arts
student-centered university Newman promoted (in The Idea of a University in 1873) had been replaced by the science-based
research-oriented university described by Flexnor as “The Idea of a Modern
University” (in 1930). Kerr believed all these models had been superseded in
his day by what he called a “multiversity.” But there are still Christian
liberal arts colleges.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Home is Where the Lord Is
In In the House of
the Lord, Henri Nouwen writes, “Prayer is the most concrete way to make our
home in God.” The more we practice the discipline of prayer, the more we experience
our home as being in God and with God. If we pray regularly and deeply we will
never really be homeless, and we will always be at home wherever we are. This
ubiquity of our divine home is due, not only to God’s omnipresence, but also to
God’s Son, Immanuel, having pitched his tent with us and having prepared an
eternal place for us with God.
Monday, February 6, 2012
Conservatives, Liberals, & Demonization
In The Righteous Mind:
Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion, Jonathan Haidt
discusses how conservatives and liberals in the U.S. have become polarized – to
the detriment of the common good. He says his social psychological research
shows both groups sacralize different
values (conservatives personal responsibility and liberals compassion for
others) and so are at odds over taxation for welfare. And because politics has
thus become religion, the groups demonize
rather than try to understand and work with each other. Haidt hopes we can
eventually adopt norms discouraging demonization just as we came to disapprove
of sexual harassment.
Friday, February 3, 2012
How Did God Create?
All Christians agree God created the universe and everything
in it. So all Christians are “Creationists” in a broad sense. But Christians
disagree about how God created. At
one extreme, Young Earth Creationists believe God created the universe, life,
and every species directly and
supernaturally. At the other extreme, Theistic Evolutionists (or better, “Evolutionary
Creationists”) believe God created all these things indirectly and naturally. Old Earth Creationists think God created
the universe by means of a natural process (the “Big Bang”) but humans by means
of a supernatural process (special creation). The Bible won’t settle this
debate; only science can.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Jesus Feeds 9000
In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus feeds two large groups, first
5000 (chapter 6) and then 4000 (chapter 8). Plausibly, the first represents
Jesus' provision for the Jews and the second his caring for the Gentiles (in
chapter 7 he moves into Gentile territory). Together, these feedings symbolize
God's salvation in Christ for all humanity. ‘5’ in 5000 could represent the Old Covenant people (think Pentateuch) and ‘4’ in 4000 the rest of
humanity (think four corners of the earth). Multiples of 1000 signify the
comprehensive nature of Jesus' work on behalf of these two groups (and thus all
people).
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Production and Reproduction
In Aristotle for
Everybody, Adler says we don’t talk about producing or creating when we discuss
childbirth. Instead, we speak of reproducing
and procreating. So though people who
have sex to have children are deliberately doing something for a purpose, they aren’t
making or producing something together but instead procreating and reproducing.
Hence, sex for conception is not a productive art. Is it a cooperative art (analogous to farming)? It seems not. The
contribution of the couple to the outcome is minimal compared to the natural
process involved. Successful farming requires more skill and more intervention
than successful procreating does.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)