Experiential learning is learning based on direct
experience. What makes something an experience
is that it is a psychological state generated by sensation or introspection
(rather than by intuition or reason). What makes an experience direct is that it is not mediated by a
linguistic or pictorial representation of something experienced (as in the case
of books or photographs). What makes a direct experience a source of learning is that the person who has had
the experience engages in active reflection on the experience in such a way as
to acquire understanding or knowledge on the basis of the experience.
Showing posts with label understanding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label understanding. Show all posts
Friday, March 23, 2012
Saturday, March 10, 2012
How to Honor an Author
Honoring the author of a text requires first attempting to understand what the author intended to
say. Consequently, readers who adopt hermeneutical approaches that preclude the
possibility of reading for authorial intent are disrespectful to authors. But courtesy
to authors also requires evaluating
what they have said (always leaving open the possibility that you have
misunderstood them). Are the author’s assertions and claims important and true?
Are the author’s suggestions and instructions useful and beneficial? Are the
author’s assurances and promises reliable and constructive? Are the author’s
questions interesting and thought-provoking? In short, have the author’s literary
goals been fulfilled?
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Apologetics & Anthropology
Dave Tetrick, a former student of mine who is with the Peace
Corps in Burkina Faso, told me he values his Westmont education now because of
how it has enabled him to learn how to understand those he has been called to
serve. He said his philosophy course on “The New Atheists” provided an
opportunity to understand and appreciate those with whom he doesn’t agree. When
I discuss the New Atheists with students, my emphasis is on an apologetical
defense of belief in God. What Dave told me convinces me that an “anthropological”
understanding of unbelievers would also be valuable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)