One of the claims for which Daniel Altman argues in Outrageous Fortunes is that neither a
purely capitalist nor a completely communist economic system is sustainable in
the long term. Among other problems, unrestricted capitalism tends to result in
market failures that create inequality and in opportunities taken by people
with more resources rather than by people with more talent. And uncompromised
communism tends to fail due to isolation from wider markets and the difficulty
of central planning. What is needed is an appropriate balance between control
and regulation on the one hand and freedom and privatization on the other.
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Friday, February 24, 2012
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Capitalism Then & Now
In The Worldly
Philosophy, Robert Heilbroner traces the history of the discipline of
economics. He looks to Adam Smith as its founder, since Smith was the first to
attempt a thorough and comprehensive description and explanation of capitalism.
Before Smith’s time, there had not been a free market. Instead, the material
needs and wants of societies had been fulfilled (or left unmet) by systems
governed by tradition or government edict. Since Smith, other theorists, such
as Malthus, Ricardo, Mill, Marx, Hobson, Veblen, and Keynes came along to make
economic observations, prognostications, and prescriptions. What is the state
of capitalism today?
Labels:
Adam Smith,
capitalism,
economics,
free market,
Heilbroner,
Hobson,
Keynes,
Malthus,
Marx,
Mill,
Ricardo,
Veblen
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)