In Radical Disciple, John Stott says God designed us to be
burdens to each other. If so, then Paul’s admonition to bear each others
burdens (Galatians 6:2) not only involves helping each other with the burdens
we have to carry due to our sin; it also requires assisting each other in
carrying the loads we have that result from our finitude. In that case, it
seems that the best way we can prepare for eternity is to become as adept at
the art of burden-bearing as we can - since this skill will be central in the
eternal Kingdom community.
Showing posts with label God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label God. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Augustine on the Divine Origin of the Bible
In The City of God,
Augustine argues Christians are justified in believing the Bible is God’s word because
of the agreement of the human authors
of Scripture. He contrasts this consensus with the disagreements between the philosophers. Whereas there is concord among
those God chose to speak on his behalf, there is discord among those who employed
reason alone to determine the truth about reality. Augustine also says there
are just enough biblical authors to make it reasonable to think their agreement
is due to God’s speaking through them without there being so many as to make
their contribution superfluous.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
What is Hell Like?
Hell is not a place but a condition in which a person
experiences separation from loving communion with God. God made us to be
fulfilled only when we are lovingly united with God and other God-lovers.
Anyone who lives outside this loving fellowship will suffer as a result. The
biblical pictures of hell are metaphorical ways of portraying this unhappy
condition. Since we are embodied souls, we experience our separation from
loving communion with God in physical and mental ways. So the biblical imagery,
though metaphorical, is fitting, and dramatizes the reality of living apart
from loving communion with God.
Labels:
biblical,
communion,
condition,
God,
hell,
imagery,
love,
mental,
metaphorical,
physical,
place,
separation,
suffering
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Nāgārjuna & Jesus
In the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā,
the Buddhist philosopher Nāgārjuna argues for an ontological middle way as a
basis for salvation from suffering. He rejects nihilism (according to which
nothing exists) and essentialism (according to which objects have an enduring
existence). He reasons that “things” are merely products of our
conceptualization, and that we need to cease reifying our experience to find
peace. Since suffering is based on attachment due to overvaluing things
(including oneself), one can avoid suffering by realizing that nothing endures
as an appropriate object of desire. But Jesus calls us to suffer in order to
love God and others.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Academic & Spiritual Disciplines in Augustine's "Confessions"
Augustine’s Confessions
consists in a blend of honest personal narrative, serious intellectual inquiry,
and heartfelt devotional prayer. From the first to the last line of this
classic work, he addresses himself to God. The entire book, in which Augustine tells
the story of his conversion to Christ and engages in profound and extensive
theological and philosophical reflection, takes the form of a prayer to his
Lord. Augustine believed the study of academic disciplines can be regularly, deliberately,
and explicitly combined with the practice of the spiritual discipline of
prayer. As a result, both his mind and his heart are transformed.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Why Bodies are Good Things
Though we can survive without our bodies, we cannot thrive in a disembodied state. Assuming
we can have memories without brains, we can think
as mere minds or souls and we can pray,
but we cannot sense and we cannot perform actions that require a physical
means; we are unable to see without eyes and we need legs in order to
dance. Though bodiless communication with other humans might be possible
through telepathy, we would not be able to see, hear, or embrace each other. In
sum, without bodies we would be crippled.
Embodiment is a wonderful gift from God.
Labels:
act,
body,
brain,
communication,
crippled,
disembodied,
embodiment,
gift,
God,
memory,
mind,
pray,
sense,
soul,
telepathy
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Stewarding Our Sexuality
In Homosexuality and
the Christian, Mark Yarhouse advocates that Christians “steward” their
sexuality. Just as we don’t own our money or other "possessions," we aren’t the
owners of our bodies (First Corinthians 6:19-20). Instead, God owns these things
and he has entrusted them to us to use them wisely for his purposes. Stewarding
our sexuality means behaving sexually in ways that serve others, further God’s
Kingdom, and bring honor and glory to God. Both Christians who struggle with a
homosexual orientation and unmarried heterosexual Christians have a special
burden to bear in this area. For them, sexual stewardship means celibacy.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Apologetics & Anthropology
Dave Tetrick, a former student of mine who is with the Peace
Corps in Burkina Faso, told me he values his Westmont education now because of
how it has enabled him to learn how to understand those he has been called to
serve. He said his philosophy course on “The New Atheists” provided an
opportunity to understand and appreciate those with whom he doesn’t agree. When
I discuss the New Atheists with students, my emphasis is on an apologetical
defense of belief in God. What Dave told me convinces me that an “anthropological”
understanding of unbelievers would also be valuable.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Knowing a God Who is Worthy of Worship
Recently I attended a talk by philosopher Paul Moser about
his latest book, The Evidence for God:
Religious Knowledge Reexamined. In this book he argues that traditional philosophical
arguments for God’s existence (ontological, cosmological, teleological) fail to
justify belief in a God who is worthy of worship. He contends that we acquire
adequate reasons to believe in such a God by means of an ongoing experience of
interacting personally with God as God discloses himself to us and we submit
our wills to his transforming love. Moser says we can know God only as
participants and not as mere spectators.
Labels:
arguments,
experience,
God,
knowledge,
love,
Moser,
participants,
reasons,
spectators,
worship
Friday, February 17, 2012
Work: Job, Career, or Vocation?
How should we think about our work? At the “microscopic”
level, it is a series of actions
ordered to a particular end. This definition applies to the simple tasks we perform during our workday. But
these tasks add up to a project and a
series of projects can constitute a job.
We think of a job primarily as a means of making money. When a job is a career, we consider it as a more
permanent and more meaningful mode of employment. But when our career becomes a
means of fulfilling our vocation, it
becomes a way to serve God.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Non-Rational Atheism
Carl Sagan created a TV series about the universe entitled
“Cosmos.” He later wrote a book with the same title based on the series. The
premise of both the TV show and the book is Sagan’s pronouncement that “The
Cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be.” The unmistakable
implication of this quasi-religious slogan is that there is no supernatural God.
The book Cosmology: A Very Short
Introduction begins with a similar presumption. The author defines
“cosmology” as the study of everything
but he never mentions God. In both cases, atheism is simply presupposed without
argument.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Idolatry and Salvation
Idolatry involves putting something that is not God in the
place of God. An alternative god is whatever we value most. Since we tend to esteem
most what we believe will satisfy us best, our idols are those non-God things
we turn to most often for fulfillment. And our fulfillment requires not only
getting more of what we need but also getting rid of what prevents us from
wholeness. If we are unable to free ourselves from such obstacles, we need a
savior. So idolaters will usually seek salvation apart from God. But salvation
is found only in Jesus Christ.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Home is Where the Lord Is
In In the House of
the Lord, Henri Nouwen writes, “Prayer is the most concrete way to make our
home in God.” The more we practice the discipline of prayer, the more we experience
our home as being in God and with God. If we pray regularly and deeply we will
never really be homeless, and we will always be at home wherever we are. This
ubiquity of our divine home is due, not only to God’s omnipresence, but also to
God’s Son, Immanuel, having pitched his tent with us and having prepared an
eternal place for us with God.
Friday, February 3, 2012
How Did God Create?
All Christians agree God created the universe and everything
in it. So all Christians are “Creationists” in a broad sense. But Christians
disagree about how God created. At
one extreme, Young Earth Creationists believe God created the universe, life,
and every species directly and
supernaturally. At the other extreme, Theistic Evolutionists (or better, “Evolutionary
Creationists”) believe God created all these things indirectly and naturally. Old Earth Creationists think God created
the universe by means of a natural process (the “Big Bang”) but humans by means
of a supernatural process (special creation). The Bible won’t settle this
debate; only science can.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Tuning In to God
In The Jesus Prayer,
Frederica Mathewes-Green likens our ability to perceive God to a “little radio”
inside us that we can tune in to the divine presence while tuning out the
static of distractions. She uses the Greek word ‘nous’ to name this receptive
and perceptive faculty. That’s the theory. The practical question is how we can
learn to adjust the tuner to find the right frequency and how we can attend to
the divine signal once we have located it. She recommends a regular rehearsal
of the Jesus prayer for this purpose: “Jesus have mercy on me, a sinner.”
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Why Science Needs Philosophy & Theology
Scientists can tell us what the facts are but we need
philosophers and theologians to help us figure out what the facts mean and how
to evaluate them. For instance, psychologists can determine how much satisfaction
people derive from an activity. However, we need to think philosophically about
why people enjoy that pastime and that will require that we find out what it means to them. We will also need to
discern whether the involvement in question is genuinely worthwhile. And that will require us to ask if engaging in it
contributes to the purpose for which God created us.
Labels:
facts,
God,
meaning,
philosophy,
satisfaction,
science,
theology,
value
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)