Honoring the author of a text requires first attempting to understand what the author intended to
say. Consequently, readers who adopt hermeneutical approaches that preclude the
possibility of reading for authorial intent are disrespectful to authors. But courtesy
to authors also requires evaluating
what they have said (always leaving open the possibility that you have
misunderstood them). Are the author’s assertions and claims important and true?
Are the author’s suggestions and instructions useful and beneficial? Are the
author’s assurances and promises reliable and constructive? Are the author’s
questions interesting and thought-provoking? In short, have the author’s literary
goals been fulfilled?
Showing posts with label questions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label questions. Show all posts
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Two Causes of Doubt
Here are two causes of doubts about the Christian faith: (1) Facing
questions for the first time and not knowing how to answer them. The remedy is
to keep thinking rather than to stop believing. And it's best to think so as to
love the truth more than ideas; (2) Letting the critics define the terms of the
debate by unconsciously accepting their questionable assumptions. The answer
here is to challenge all assumptions – including your own about critical
thinking. Questions don’t have to lead to doubt and then to dismissal. And
believers don’t have to accept the burden of proof.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)